January 11, 2009 6:03PM
Obama’s Jobs Plan Detailed: The Consumer Needs to Step Up
By Brian Sullivan
-
Share:
Here come the jobs. And they rely on two big things: construction and a consumer turnaround.
This weekend President-elect Barack Obama unveiled more specifics about his proposed plan to create 3.5 million jobs over the next two years. That is an ambitious goal and has understandably faced skepticism, especially without specifics on how this would happen. We now have a more specific outline of the plan. It was released this weekend. (WSJ story has a link directly to the 14 page report in .PDF format or you can access it through Obama’s website).
The plan involves a government spending program “just over” $775 billion dollars, with the key components being outlined as:
- A package in the range that the President-Elect has discussed is expected to create
between three and four million jobs by the end of 2010. - Tax cuts, especially temporary ones, and fiscal relief to the states are likely to create
fewer jobs than direct increases in government purchases. However, because there is a
limit on how much government investment can be carried out efficiently in a short time
frame, and because tax cuts and state relief can be implemented quickly, they are crucial
elements of any package aimed at easing economic distress quickly.
- Certain industries, such as construction and manufacturing, are likely to experience
particularly strong job growth under a recovery package that includes an emphasis on
infrastructure, energy, and school repair. But, the more general stimulative measures,
such as a middle class tax cut and fiscal relief to the states, as well as the feedback effects
of greater employment in key industries, mean that jobs are likely to be created in all
sectors of the economy.
- More than 90 percent of the jobs created are likely to be in the private sector. Many of
the government jobs are likely to be professionals whose jobs are saved from state and
local budget cuts by state fiscal relief.
- A package is likely to create jobs paying a range of wages. It is also likely to move many
workers from part-time to full-time work.
The report details expected job growth by industry by the 4th quarter of 2010. Here’s how the Obama camp breaks it down by expected job growth per sector by that time:
- Energy: 459,000
- Infrastructure: 377,000
- Health Care: 244,000
- Education: 250,000
- Protecting Vulnerable: 549,000
- State Relief: 821,000
- Making Work Pay Tax Cut: 505,000
- Business Tax Incentives: 470,0000
(Note to Obama camp: Your report has bad math. In the report you have “direct effect” of jobs on energy at 305,000 and “indirect effect” at 153,000, totaling “459,000.” 305k + 153k = 458k. The same is done with the ‘infrastructure’ breakdown. Small detail, but you got to get this right).
There are a few interesting points to dig out:
1. The public outcry over fear of big(ger) government is resonating with the Obama administration. The plan now says that “90% of the jobs are likely to be in the private sector.” This is up from earlier estimates that only 80% would be in private sector. Of course, the bad news is that this plan still presumes to add 244,000 government jobs (listed in the report).
2. Consumer recovery is a major component of this plan. The report outlines that more than 1.1 million of these jobs will come from “retail trade” and “leisure and hospitality” (604,000 & 499,000 respectively). These are jobs that are nearly entirely reliant on the macro economy and consumer confidence. They are less impacted by government plans than by a simple overall economic recovery.

3. The biggest jump in jobs is expected to be in construction (678,000 in the report). Let’s hope that construction goes to projects that truly need it and will positively impact GDP and transportation instead of merely re-patching existing highways. We have a real chance to invest in and build newer, smarter energy and transportation grids that can help define how we live in the next century. We need it. Not only to reduce dependency on foreign oil, but also to help shape city design and transportation. Consider that the travel time by train from near my home in New Jersey to New York’s Penn Station hasn’t changed meaningfully in 30 years. This while France’s national railway - SNCF - recently hit more than 350mph on a train trip from Marseille to Paris. A(note to Obama camp: please save some money for New York City’s Penn Station, its a dump). America is a leader in many areas but energy and transportation aren’t two of them.
So there you go. “The plan” to create (or save) 3.5 million jobs. Many Americans will be counting on this to work. The Obama jobs plan is one that is sure to generate much debate. It is greatly ambitious and depends on many things that are not in the control of the government, namely a macro economic rebound and consumer spending increase. Still, confidence and psychology are mysterious things and perhaps a constant reminder that “things are going to be okay” will provide a lift to this sagging economy.
One positive though: I give the President-elect credit for laying out specifics in this manner. Too few politicians these days actually give firm answers on anything, instead choosing to stammer and dance around any topic. Now we have a guide. And one that we can hold the soon-to-be President to.

-
Share:

I’m in the equipment rental business (over 30 years) and it is booming. We rent specialized equipment to projects involving pipeline and wind farms. I need to buy some equipment and vehicles. I would order $30,000,000 of new equipment for immediate delivery if I could get a loan to buy it. Nothing is going to happen until credit for business is again available.
He doesn’t want people to save money he wants people to spend money. That is because all of his advisers are Keynesian economists who know that the country would go bankrupt unless people and governments spend spend spend.
I would advise everyone to stock up on non-perishable food items because the guy is going to spend us into the poor house.
The man (Obama)is clueless. His only experience was as an organizer for the very corrupt Chicago political mob. Now he is going to run a country? To even suggest I might ask his opinion is to suggest I’ve just lost my power of observation and reason. He suggested giving $3000 to anyone who hired a new employee. Shows how stupid the man is. If taxes are reduced on small business and government keeps its nose out and business does well they will hire more people. He will grow government to a mamouth intrusive entity causing the distruction of this country. The cities that do poorly in this country are run by democrats. Remember Dinkins? Good Lord!
Obama is just another ambitious politician. What makes him unique among other politicians is that he has done virtually nothing to get this far. At least the others have padded their resumes by associating themselves with charities over the years and have their names attached to significant bills to give themselves some cred albeit false cred.
We need to start DRAFTING candidates for office who are proven leaders and GENUINE heros who don’t WANT the Job! After watching Fox News’ special on Gary Sinise, I think he would be an outstanding US Senator - and he happens to be from ILLINOIS! There is absolutely no reason why he would want this job and that is EXACTLY why we need him there. There’s a petition to sign and send to Mr. Sinise at http://www.SiniseForSenate.com
Out of control spending coming to a neighborhood near your wallet.
REPUBLICANS WERE TRASHED, and DEMOCRATS GOT A FREE PASS ON THEIR INVOLVEMENT IN THE CREATION OF THE ECONOMIC MESS
Is that an intelligent way to run a country? Is it right that Democrats be getting off “scott free,” and will now have free reign over fixing the mess?
- -
http://pacificgatepost.blogspot.com/2009/01/democrat-responsibility-for-economic.html
- -
No feet are being held to the fire. Can we assume Madoff arrived just in time to take the brunt of it away from Congress?
Will anything change? No chance. America is heading into the new and never before seen levels of debt. Here comes inflation.
No problem. The Social Security “Trust Fund” is nothing but a room full of government IOUs. They will just print the money to pay you off. Of course, the money may be worthless, but what politician worries about that?
My husband is concerned about where the money will come from to fund this recovery package. His primary concern is that our Social Security will be depleted. We are both 62 and have signed up for benefits to begin in 2009, and continue to work also.
Is there a danger that our S.S. benefit could be forfeited?
Respectfully, it is not the consumer but business that needs to “step up.”
Instead of “keeping their powder dry,” putting off capital expenditures, and engaging in massive restructuring and headcount reductions, businesses boasting of strong balance sheets and undrawn revolving credit facilities need to show their confidence in America’s economy first.
While the consumer is battening down the hatches by doing exactly the same things as big businesses, they are not bolstered by possibility and/or likelihood of a government bailout and are much more likely to see their access to credit disappear. Consumers also generally have only one or two sources of income and not the multitude of sources businesses enjoy.
Expecting millions of consumers to lead a recovery by acting against their own best interests is not only naive, but stupid. Too bad the Ivy League doesn’t offer classes in courage.