The Brian Sullivan Blog
  • December 3, 2008 12:46 PM EST by Brian Sullivan

    Prevent a GM Bankruptcy? It May Already Be Here

    General Motors President Fritz Henderson said Wednesday bankruptcy isn't a viable option for struggling U.S. automakers, maintaining that a new retooling plan can save the industry.   He added that General Motors is ready to undertake a host of steps needed to re-size, but said that "to win, you've got to win with product and technology and we do not want to give consumers a reason not to buy our cars and trucks."   Nancy Pelosi has echoed the "not an option" commentary around the automakers, not surprising given the support of big labor and the UAW in the recent election.   The problem is that the "not an option" may already be here.

    GM has two primary arguments about why a bankruptcy should not be permitted to occur: 1) too many jobs will be lost in its core company as well as supporting industries, and 2) Americans will not buy a car or truck from a bankrupt company.

    No one doubts the massive economic impact to the U.S. of any bankruptcy filing by one or all of the three Detroit-based automakers (I simply can't call them the "Big 3" anymore).    Millions of people depend on these companies for their livelihoods, from the executives at the companies themselves to dealers, salespeople and parts companies.   It would be a trickle-down waterfall of financial pain and could be the straw that breaks Michigan's back.  But even as the "not an option" rhetoric heats up, the grim reality is all too apparent; General Motors is  acting as if they are already operating under a de facto reorganization.

    As executives of the three companies are heading back to Washington (driving in hybrids this time, not flying) with actual plans and a more detailed argument about why they deserve taxpayer money to stay out of bankruptcy, consider what's already going on with GM:

    Hallmarks of most bankruptcies include worthless equity, a restructuring of debt and massive layoffs.   We already have that with General Motors.

    The stock has sunk.   The bonds trade weakly and the company may ask some bondholders to change terms, and job losses and plant closings have been a constant for the past few years from the company.

    The company argues that people won't buy a car from a bankrupt company.   Yet they aren't buying many now.   Sales have fallen by nearly half in the past year and GM's American market share has dropped from nearly 60% at one point to just over 20% today.

    Aside from an official filing and the debtor-in-possession financing that goes with it, many of the hallmarks of a bankruptcy are already here.   Simply put, when a company says it needs billions "now" to make its cash-flow needs, it's saying a lot.

    No one wants to see GM, Ford or Chrysler go out of business.   Too many Americans rely on these companies for jobs and retirement benefits.    But while we argue over the ins and outs of bankruptcy, the market and company are acting as if that's already what's happening.

Leslie Opp

This congress is a joke, why are the dems even entertaining the notion of a bailout for these business failures? They're the ones that were spewing anti-corporate slogans like "we're not going to give tax dollars to companies that have moved jobs out of the US". Bankruptcy is the best option, let a Bankruptcy judge, not politicians, determine the best course forward. Obviously management and the unions have colluded to make the auto industry what it is today.

December 3, 2008 at 3:02 pm

Captain America

Without greater concessions from the unions, these businesses cannot continue to operate the way they are currently run. The obligations to healthcare and obscene retirment commitments (for the spouses lifetime, what?) will bankrupt them eventually. Let them file now, write off those improper obligations and start fresh if they can. It's not the taxpayers fault that they cave in to extortion from the unions. The foreign automakers are still making cars in America and generally succeeding. It CAN be done if you don't let the union break your back.

December 3, 2008 at 2:57 pm

Walt in Ohio

No bail outs for anyone. No industry should receive them. Let the market work. Any company that fails and doesn't emerge from bankruptcy will have it's assets by those that remain thus creating more jobs and opportunities for those responsible and viable companies that remain in the industry.

December 3, 2008 at 2:52 pm

lou dog

What a joke....Bailout for banking but not manufacturing??? Banking produces no tangible goods and is a parasitic business model. Where are our priorities???

December 3, 2008 at 2:41 pm

Walt in Ohio

They need to go to the financial markets not us, the tax payors. If the the markets think it's too risky to lend to them why should we, the tax payers, be on the hook?

December 3, 2008 at 2:07 pm

about this blog

  • Brian Sullivan joined FOX Business Network (FBN) in April 2008 as an anchor. He co-anchors the 10am-12pm ET hours of the FOX Business block. Prior to joining FBN, Sullivan served as an anchor for Bloomberg Television where he hosted the programs Morning Call and In Focus.

most popular posts