<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pelosi Front-Runs Obama on the Economic Agenda</title>
	<atom:link href="http://briansullivan.blogs.foxbusiness.com/2008/11/06/pelosi-front-runs-obama-on-the-economic-agenda/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://briansullivan.blogs.foxbusiness.com/2008/11/06/pelosi-front-runs-obama-on-the-economic-agenda/</link>
	<description>FOXBusiness</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:24:21 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: JT</title>
		<link>http://briansullivan.blogs.foxbusiness.com/2008/11/06/pelosi-front-runs-obama-on-the-economic-agenda/comment-page-2/#comment-2165</link>
		<dc:creator>JT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 15:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://briansullivan.blogs.foxbusiness.com/?p=272#comment-2165</guid>
		<description>I guess the dems will have to decide if we are going to be an isolationist economy.  Or still be a part of the global ecomonic community.  Obama wants to expand unions, which will increase the cost of goods, and decrease our ability to compete in the global economy.  The only way we can compete and actually do what Obama plans on doing is isolationism via heavy tarrifs, or backing out of current trade deals.  The WTO won&#039;t be happy with that, neither will our current trading partners. Will be interesting to see how this goes... Will green energy jobs fill the void for the loss of manufacturing jobs across seas?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess the dems will have to decide if we are going to be an isolationist economy.  Or still be a part of the global ecomonic community.  Obama wants to expand unions, which will increase the cost of goods, and decrease our ability to compete in the global economy.  The only way we can compete and actually do what Obama plans on doing is isolationism via heavy tarrifs, or backing out of current trade deals.  The WTO won&#8217;t be happy with that, neither will our current trading partners. Will be interesting to see how this goes&#8230; Will green energy jobs fill the void for the loss of manufacturing jobs across seas?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Plumb</title>
		<link>http://briansullivan.blogs.foxbusiness.com/2008/11/06/pelosi-front-runs-obama-on-the-economic-agenda/comment-page-2/#comment-2141</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Plumb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 20:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://briansullivan.blogs.foxbusiness.com/?p=272#comment-2141</guid>
		<description>All of these comments are right on the money {no pun intended} I find it interesting that I have been hearing the same thing from Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh almost daily for the past year or so. Why is no one listening. Maybe in the end it will be a good thing Obama got elected {I refrain from using the term won since he won nothing} the damage he is sure to cause, just might be what it takes to make the right people open their eyes and see what is happening to America and our way of life. It may be time to re-invent our system of government, not the way Obama wishes to take us though. I dare say that if something is going to be done to stop the death of America as we know it, it better happen pretty soon or it will be too late. I also find it ironic that Obama ran on a platform of raising taxes and all of a sudden all of his advisors with some savy are advising him to take the path John McCain wanted to take i.e. no tax increases for anyone. It almost sounds like John McCain has become his new secret economic advisor in regard to taxation.
Now I have a question for anyone that has the answer. Why in the world have the people of this country allowed Nancy Pelosi to acquire so much power when she has, and has for some time, the lowest approval rating of anyone in our entire government.
Given all of the recent events and the questionable means by which some events have occured, one has to wonder if our enemys have not succeded in positioning themselves so as to allow them to collapse our economy and defeat us &quot;without firing a shot&quot;. Anyone remember who said that? I do and it scares the H... out of me since I can not find a rational explanation for many things that have unfolded leading up to where we are now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All of these comments are right on the money {no pun intended} I find it interesting that I have been hearing the same thing from Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh almost daily for the past year or so. Why is no one listening. Maybe in the end it will be a good thing Obama got elected {I refrain from using the term won since he won nothing} the damage he is sure to cause, just might be what it takes to make the right people open their eyes and see what is happening to America and our way of life. It may be time to re-invent our system of government, not the way Obama wishes to take us though. I dare say that if something is going to be done to stop the death of America as we know it, it better happen pretty soon or it will be too late. I also find it ironic that Obama ran on a platform of raising taxes and all of a sudden all of his advisors with some savy are advising him to take the path John McCain wanted to take i.e. no tax increases for anyone. It almost sounds like John McCain has become his new secret economic advisor in regard to taxation.<br />
Now I have a question for anyone that has the answer. Why in the world have the people of this country allowed Nancy Pelosi to acquire so much power when she has, and has for some time, the lowest approval rating of anyone in our entire government.<br />
Given all of the recent events and the questionable means by which some events have occured, one has to wonder if our enemys have not succeded in positioning themselves so as to allow them to collapse our economy and defeat us &#8220;without firing a shot&#8221;. Anyone remember who said that? I do and it scares the H&#8230; out of me since I can not find a rational explanation for many things that have unfolded leading up to where we are now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: plb</title>
		<link>http://briansullivan.blogs.foxbusiness.com/2008/11/06/pelosi-front-runs-obama-on-the-economic-agenda/comment-page-2/#comment-2134</link>
		<dc:creator>plb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 21:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://briansullivan.blogs.foxbusiness.com/?p=272#comment-2134</guid>
		<description>Who has the scariest-looking face:  1. Jack Nicholson as &quot;The Joker&quot; 2. Michael Jackson 3. Nancy Pelosi?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who has the scariest-looking face:  1. Jack Nicholson as &#8220;The Joker&#8221; 2. Michael Jackson 3. Nancy Pelosi?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Aldridge</title>
		<link>http://briansullivan.blogs.foxbusiness.com/2008/11/06/pelosi-front-runs-obama-on-the-economic-agenda/comment-page-1/#comment-2132</link>
		<dc:creator>David Aldridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 21:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://briansullivan.blogs.foxbusiness.com/?p=272#comment-2132</guid>
		<description>Brian

Shawns reference to the artical below regarding who owns America is well recieved by this conservative. However, who cares whether Pelosi or Obama wins the race to the bully pulpit... either way the markets will crash. What is important is what will America do about it after the collapse. There is a another great depression out there just around the corner and the liberal media is covering it up outright, the conservative media is suspiciously absent. Socialists like Pelosi and Obama are going to kill the free market system and soon folks wont have the luxury of reading comments like this - they will be too busy waiting in bread lines - that is assuming they survive the race riots that certainly will follow an Obama failure. Don&#039;t misunderstand me, I don&#039;t believe that race should be an issue, I just recognize the likely hood that it will occurr.

The only comfort I take from the idea that the world is &#039;flat&#039; and America is owned by foreigners is the possibility that these foreigners will realize that if America fails, they fail. I have no faith though that Obama and Pelosi have what it takes to manipulate this scenario to our favor. On the contrary, they race to push us over the cliffs edge is too tantalizing to them. 

Instead of reporting on who wins this race... maybe report on why they are racing and what the consequences are of either one of them winning, or losing, as I look at it.

David Aldridge</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian</p>
<p>Shawns reference to the artical below regarding who owns America is well recieved by this conservative. However, who cares whether Pelosi or Obama wins the race to the bully pulpit&#8230; either way the markets will crash. What is important is what will America do about it after the collapse. There is a another great depression out there just around the corner and the liberal media is covering it up outright, the conservative media is suspiciously absent. Socialists like Pelosi and Obama are going to kill the free market system and soon folks wont have the luxury of reading comments like this &#8211; they will be too busy waiting in bread lines &#8211; that is assuming they survive the race riots that certainly will follow an Obama failure. Don&#8217;t misunderstand me, I don&#8217;t believe that race should be an issue, I just recognize the likely hood that it will occurr.</p>
<p>The only comfort I take from the idea that the world is &#8216;flat&#8217; and America is owned by foreigners is the possibility that these foreigners will realize that if America fails, they fail. I have no faith though that Obama and Pelosi have what it takes to manipulate this scenario to our favor. On the contrary, they race to push us over the cliffs edge is too tantalizing to them. </p>
<p>Instead of reporting on who wins this race&#8230; maybe report on why they are racing and what the consequences are of either one of them winning, or losing, as I look at it.</p>
<p>David Aldridge</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy</title>
		<link>http://briansullivan.blogs.foxbusiness.com/2008/11/06/pelosi-front-runs-obama-on-the-economic-agenda/comment-page-1/#comment-2131</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 21:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://briansullivan.blogs.foxbusiness.com/?p=272#comment-2131</guid>
		<description>Comment by a Capitalist, why weren&#039;t you nominated???  Very smart!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comment by a Capitalist, why weren&#8217;t you nominated???  Very smart!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Capitalist</title>
		<link>http://briansullivan.blogs.foxbusiness.com/2008/11/06/pelosi-front-runs-obama-on-the-economic-agenda/comment-page-1/#comment-2129</link>
		<dc:creator>A Capitalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 20:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://briansullivan.blogs.foxbusiness.com/?p=272#comment-2129</guid>
		<description>Gov&#039;t stimulus packages are like being forced to go on a shopping spree to buy goods you don&#039;t want.  They tax you, give you some (not all) of the money back and tell you to spend it.  Some get money back that never paid tax.  That would be your money the gov&#039;t gave to someone else.  Now, someone else spends it on things you didn&#039;t want.  But that&#039;s ok, you didn&#039;t get to keep what they purchased with your money anyway.  This form of gov&#039;t stimulus package is nothing but a wealth redistribution combined with a small tax break for some.

I say it again.  If you want to stimulate the economy, stop the gov&#039;t from spending.  Gov&#039;t stimulus spending just stimulates inflation and wastes resources.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gov&#8217;t stimulus packages are like being forced to go on a shopping spree to buy goods you don&#8217;t want.  They tax you, give you some (not all) of the money back and tell you to spend it.  Some get money back that never paid tax.  That would be your money the gov&#8217;t gave to someone else.  Now, someone else spends it on things you didn&#8217;t want.  But that&#8217;s ok, you didn&#8217;t get to keep what they purchased with your money anyway.  This form of gov&#8217;t stimulus package is nothing but a wealth redistribution combined with a small tax break for some.</p>
<p>I say it again.  If you want to stimulate the economy, stop the gov&#8217;t from spending.  Gov&#8217;t stimulus spending just stimulates inflation and wastes resources.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://briansullivan.blogs.foxbusiness.com/2008/11/06/pelosi-front-runs-obama-on-the-economic-agenda/comment-page-1/#comment-2128</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 19:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://briansullivan.blogs.foxbusiness.com/?p=272#comment-2128</guid>
		<description>Like the article &quot;when America no longer owns America&quot; says, we basically have gone from a producing society with the production (ie. jobs) and profits staying here in the U.S. to a bunch of brokers and consumers with a credit card.  Wow, that party is over.  Ya can&#039;t run, on avg. 27 to 1 in derivatives, and expect that to last.

Pelosi, I ask you please....please don&#039;t try to give the USA any of your &quot;solutions&quot;.  Your only &quot;solutions&quot; are more debt, more inflation, more subsidies, more redistribution of wealth, more regulation, more govt intervention, and more taxes.  These are not answers to a capitalistic society and certainly does not bode well for the stock market.  No wonder the companies that have made the USA economically balanced for years have gotten out of dodge.  Why would anyone, with the taxes, union control, regulation, and legal risks want to start or invest into a company in the great ol USA? 

If only they would give incentive for the investors to invest, owners to take risks, and a risk/reward proposition that was worth investing back into America, capital would come on back, but they just don&#039;t.  They just don&#039;t understand.  The majority on capital hill are lawyers, and have never took one risk of starting their own company in the USA.

Brian, you have on your show these small business owners (ie. car dealers, house builders) that tell us the problem is a credit freeze, yet you don&#039;t spend time dealing with the real issues to our economy.  Are economy does not need easier credit and forced lending by banks to shove people into homes and cars they can&#039;t afford.  There is an oversupply of housing and we just have to deal with it.

What our economy needs is solid policy making that provides the incentive for capital to flow back and allows the production and profits to stay here in the US.  

You have the platform Brian, and your smart, and you seem to be an honest guy.  We all need to understand what is really wrong before we can fix the problem.  You can help America understand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like the article &#8220;when America no longer owns America&#8221; says, we basically have gone from a producing society with the production (ie. jobs) and profits staying here in the U.S. to a bunch of brokers and consumers with a credit card.  Wow, that party is over.  Ya can&#8217;t run, on avg. 27 to 1 in derivatives, and expect that to last.</p>
<p>Pelosi, I ask you please&#8230;.please don&#8217;t try to give the USA any of your &#8220;solutions&#8221;.  Your only &#8220;solutions&#8221; are more debt, more inflation, more subsidies, more redistribution of wealth, more regulation, more govt intervention, and more taxes.  These are not answers to a capitalistic society and certainly does not bode well for the stock market.  No wonder the companies that have made the USA economically balanced for years have gotten out of dodge.  Why would anyone, with the taxes, union control, regulation, and legal risks want to start or invest into a company in the great ol USA? </p>
<p>If only they would give incentive for the investors to invest, owners to take risks, and a risk/reward proposition that was worth investing back into America, capital would come on back, but they just don&#8217;t.  They just don&#8217;t understand.  The majority on capital hill are lawyers, and have never took one risk of starting their own company in the USA.</p>
<p>Brian, you have on your show these small business owners (ie. car dealers, house builders) that tell us the problem is a credit freeze, yet you don&#8217;t spend time dealing with the real issues to our economy.  Are economy does not need easier credit and forced lending by banks to shove people into homes and cars they can&#8217;t afford.  There is an oversupply of housing and we just have to deal with it.</p>
<p>What our economy needs is solid policy making that provides the incentive for capital to flow back and allows the production and profits to stay here in the US.  </p>
<p>You have the platform Brian, and your smart, and you seem to be an honest guy.  We all need to understand what is really wrong before we can fix the problem.  You can help America understand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bradley Fluetsch, CFA</title>
		<link>http://briansullivan.blogs.foxbusiness.com/2008/11/06/pelosi-front-runs-obama-on-the-economic-agenda/comment-page-1/#comment-2127</link>
		<dc:creator>Bradley Fluetsch, CFA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 19:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://briansullivan.blogs.foxbusiness.com/?p=272#comment-2127</guid>
		<description>A stimulus package does little good if consumers do not spend it.  So I have devised the ultimate stimulus package.  I call it consumer credit roulette.  First we get ten economists to agree on what social securities numbers should be included (demographic eligibility).  Next we get the same ten economists to decide how much we want to stimulate the economy. 

Now, in lottery fashion we randomly pick social security numbers and pay off all of their consumer credit:  Boats, cars, student loans, credit cards, gas cards, mall cards.  Hey if you owe your bookie we will pay him too!

We keep picking social security numbers until we run out of money. 

Check out www.fluetschfinancialservices.com and read all of my blog posts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A stimulus package does little good if consumers do not spend it.  So I have devised the ultimate stimulus package.  I call it consumer credit roulette.  First we get ten economists to agree on what social securities numbers should be included (demographic eligibility).  Next we get the same ten economists to decide how much we want to stimulate the economy. </p>
<p>Now, in lottery fashion we randomly pick social security numbers and pay off all of their consumer credit:  Boats, cars, student loans, credit cards, gas cards, mall cards.  Hey if you owe your bookie we will pay him too!</p>
<p>We keep picking social security numbers until we run out of money. </p>
<p>Check out <a href="http://www.fluetschfinancialservices.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.fluetschfinancialservices.com</a> and read all of my blog posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Capitalist</title>
		<link>http://briansullivan.blogs.foxbusiness.com/2008/11/06/pelosi-front-runs-obama-on-the-economic-agenda/comment-page-1/#comment-2126</link>
		<dc:creator>A Capitalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 18:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://briansullivan.blogs.foxbusiness.com/?p=272#comment-2126</guid>
		<description>T.M.O.

Hey I&#039;m right there with you about someone cutting taxes.  I don&#039;t are who cuts them, just get them cut.  What I am concerned about, whether it be a republican or democrat, is increased excessive gov&#039;t spending.  Gov&#039;t can only spend taxpayer&#039;s money since gov&#039;t does earn a living like you do or a business does.  So if at the same time we are cutting taxes (a good thing), we are then turning around and increasing deficit spending, we&#039;re still being taxed.  How you ask?  Because if gov&#039;t doesn&#039;t have the money, it borrows it into existence off the old printing press.  More paper money, means inflation, and that means the dollar in your pocket just went down in value.  The value that it went down was the amount you&#039;ve been taxed. 

I want the politicians to cut taxes, cut spending, balance the budget, and begin repaying the obscene amount of debt it owes.  I want it to get out of our daily lives with a tax on everything we do, electricity tax, gasoline tax, telecomm tax, cable tax, income tax, capital gains tax, inheritance tax, social security tax, medicare tax, unemployment tax, tire tax, sales tax, real estate tax, and on it goes.  That would be a real stimulus to the economy.  Money would be spent/used by individuals efficiently instead of wasted by gov&#039;t.  If left to itself, the gov&#039;t would spend itself and all of us into the poor house, see the old Soviet Union.  We&#039;re no where near that bad, but we are slowly moving in that direction.  We need to go back the other way, toward Thomas Jefferson&#039;s economic ideas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>T.M.O.</p>
<p>Hey I&#8217;m right there with you about someone cutting taxes.  I don&#8217;t are who cuts them, just get them cut.  What I am concerned about, whether it be a republican or democrat, is increased excessive gov&#8217;t spending.  Gov&#8217;t can only spend taxpayer&#8217;s money since gov&#8217;t does earn a living like you do or a business does.  So if at the same time we are cutting taxes (a good thing), we are then turning around and increasing deficit spending, we&#8217;re still being taxed.  How you ask?  Because if gov&#8217;t doesn&#8217;t have the money, it borrows it into existence off the old printing press.  More paper money, means inflation, and that means the dollar in your pocket just went down in value.  The value that it went down was the amount you&#8217;ve been taxed. </p>
<p>I want the politicians to cut taxes, cut spending, balance the budget, and begin repaying the obscene amount of debt it owes.  I want it to get out of our daily lives with a tax on everything we do, electricity tax, gasoline tax, telecomm tax, cable tax, income tax, capital gains tax, inheritance tax, social security tax, medicare tax, unemployment tax, tire tax, sales tax, real estate tax, and on it goes.  That would be a real stimulus to the economy.  Money would be spent/used by individuals efficiently instead of wasted by gov&#8217;t.  If left to itself, the gov&#8217;t would spend itself and all of us into the poor house, see the old Soviet Union.  We&#8217;re no where near that bad, but we are slowly moving in that direction.  We need to go back the other way, toward Thomas Jefferson&#8217;s economic ideas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LVuong</title>
		<link>http://briansullivan.blogs.foxbusiness.com/2008/11/06/pelosi-front-runs-obama-on-the-economic-agenda/comment-page-1/#comment-2125</link>
		<dc:creator>LVuong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 18:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://briansullivan.blogs.foxbusiness.com/?p=272#comment-2125</guid>
		<description>Pelosi, and not Obama, will run the country. There simply will be more bureaucrats, lobbyists and lawyers, at state and local levels as government grows bigger and bigger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pelosi, and not Obama, will run the country. There simply will be more bureaucrats, lobbyists and lawyers, at state and local levels as government grows bigger and bigger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>