The Brian Sullivan Blog
  • September 3, 2008 03:36 PM EDT by Brian Sullivan

    Note to Automakers: Deep Discounts Are Dirty Words

    The dismal numbers say it all: even deep "employee" discounts and other programs aren't enticing strapped consumers to buy cars.

    While all the automakers had a painful August, the sales declines for General Motors (GM) and Ford (F) were mind-blowing.   GM sales dropped 20%, while Ford posted a staggering 27.6% haircut.   Ford truck sales dropped 39%, while SUV sales collapsed 53% from last year.   

    And it could get even more dire.  The Wall Street Journal cited Ford executive Jim Farley as saying the second half of the year could be just as bad or even worse.  It's hard to imagine an uglier second half than the first, and now it's going to be a real challenge to hit even 13 million total cars and trucks sold in America for the full year.   Even the once-mighty Toyota (TM) and Honda (HMC) are hurting, proving that fuel economy alone won't bring in buyers.

    These figures come even as the automakers try everything but using dancing bears to sell cars.   Zero percent financing for five years, cash back and "employee discounts" (which I have never understood) are all proving not to be enough to move cars from the lot.

    But while the automakers certainly are trying to win goodwill with these programs, there may be a dangerous downside: destruction of brand equity.  I call it the "Macy's/J.C. Penney syndrome."  Every week I seem to get a circular in the paper offering some "big sale" at the stores for whatever minor holiday or event is on the calendar.  "Enjoy Special Arbor Day Savings," or, "Celebrate Flag Day with a new Orange Peeler."

    Okay, I made those up -- but you get my point.   I have become numb to the "big deals," but more importantly I have become conditioned to the idea that I can't go to Macy's (M) or J.C. Penney (JCP) unless there is a big sale.   Why would I ever pay full price?

    Ford, GM and Chrysler risk conditioning buyers in the same way (if they haven't already).  There are so many programs and discounts that it's likely American car buyers now believe they deserve a deep discount on their car or truck.

    This creates a destruction in the belief of the value of the product.   Consumers have shown they are more than willing to pay full price for a product they believe offers value or status benefits.   A $75,000 Mercedes CLK will get you where you need to go the same as a Ford Focus, but how often do you see sales on the CLK?   A Rolex tells the same time as a $100 Casio, but yet Rolex remains in business.   And Rolex doesn't have to discount because a Rolex buyer believes she is getting a superior product and brand awareness with the purchase.

    Ford, GM and Chrysler need to work more on convincing buyers they are getting a great product, not just a good deal.   Consumers often equate "sale" with "cheap item" or "unwanted."   If you can't sell cars and trucks with $5,000 cash back and the now-extended employee pricing program, why have them?   It would be better to focus on value and style, and regrowing the brand equity the automakers have lost.   If cars aren't selling with deep discounts, change the marketing and at least try to make money on the cars you do sell.

Earl Robinson

Dealership's should also be seriously looked at if they want to attract me. Opened 7 days should get me in there on the weekends. Also, in the past when they worked on my car that was still under warranty it was delayed, or not fixed correctly.

September 5, 2008 at 9:16 am

Steve Klein

If American automakers would just PAT ATTENTION to the details, they would be OK. They reason most people (me included) will NOT buy American is not the cost but the poor over all quality of the vehicle. I'm not necessarily talking about build quality or ride quality. So many Americans are sick of having to make repairs to vehicles because of shoddy (read build-it-cheap) engineering that bites you down the road at the repair shop. Just ask the Jeep owners that have to replace window regulators at $500 a pop at the dealer because of a 5 cent piece of plastic that breaks. Or, the Chrysler Sebring owners that have to shell out big bucks to fix transmission problems due to plastic regulator pieces failing there. The automakers don't seem to hear the Americans banging at their doors saying "Its not right! Build a better car!"

September 5, 2008 at 5:57 am

mark smith

hey brian, have you found that ression you couldnt locate a few weeks ago ?

September 4, 2008 at 3:00 pm

ANTHONY H.

Nice words for marketing plan. Sound, prudent. Big problem. There are more people who CAN'T Afford a Mercedes than can. Those same peoples DON'T have the monies to spend on big ticket items. Those folks are called middle class. If you left New York once in a while and got further west than New Jersey, you might actually bump into us.

September 4, 2008 at 9:28 am

bruce

Years ago I read a article in Automobile Magazine called "the Prestige Deficit" by Patrik Bedard. The gist of it was Lotto winners were running out and buying BMWs and Jaguars, but passing Cadillacs by. Why? Because Cadillacs had become nothing more than gussied up Chevy's by the late 1980's. As the unfortunate owner of an 85 Cimmaron I can attest to this. What was a Cimmaron? It was a Chevy Cavalier with a V6 Shoved into its engine bay. The Big Three aren't selling quality anymore, there selling an image, and the image cries CHEAP! In 1957 Studebaker tried this with something called the Scotsman (I kid you not). You could buy the Scotsman for a little less than the competition, but you'd wind up with a bargain basement piece of crap. Fast forward 50 years and here we go again.

September 4, 2008 at 8:07 am

Howard Kotlowski

Prove to the public that your vehicle is reliable by offering a total warranty for 100,000 miles. Your image is tarnished by the vehicles you produced in the past. This will allow you to forget the deep discounts.

September 3, 2008 at 11:31 pm

Fred McGuillicutty

Will the setbacks cause automakers to innovate or are we looking at a new generation of Reliant K's? Fred M. Pearl River, NY

September 3, 2008 at 10:00 pm

about this blog

  • Brian Sullivan joined FOX Business Network (FBN) in April 2008 as an anchor. He co-anchors the 10am-12pm ET hours of the FOX Business block. Prior to joining FBN, Sullivan served as an anchor for Bloomberg Television where he hosted the programs Morning Call and In Focus.

most popular posts